4 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
JC_Collins's avatar

Thank goodness. Sanity prevails.

Expand full comment
Steersman's avatar

More or less. A new dawn is definitely "breaking" -- so to speak -- but don't think the sun will be fully above the horizon until virtually everyone realizes that sex (reproductive abilities) and gender (sexually dimorphic personalities and personality types) are two entirely different kettles of fish.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2023Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Steersman's avatar

CF: "Sexual dimorphism refers specifically to physical characteristics and a phrase like 'sexually dimorphic personalities' is nonsensical."

You seem to have cornered the market in pigheaded ignorance.

Wikipedia: "Sexual dimorphism is the condition where sexes of the same species exhibit different morphological characteristics, particularly characteristics not directly involved in reproduction. .... Differences may include secondary sex characteristics, size, weight, color, markings, or behavioral or cognitive traits."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism

And Colin says the SAME thing:

CW: "Sexual dimorphism, in contrast, refers to the differences in size, shape, color, behavior, and other physical and behavioral characteristics between males and females of the same species."

https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/the-sex-binary-vs-sexual-dimorphism

Do let us all know how you fare convincing Wikipedia and Colin that their "behavioral or cognitive traits" -- AKA, "personalities" -- are "nonsensical" ... :roll-eyes: 🙄

CF: "And then there's logic. Read. Learn. http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/logicalfallacies.html"

LoL. "Dueling citations"? Tsk, tsk. What a hypocrite.

Expand full comment