One question that no one has posed (or I may have missed it) is why Boylan et al feel the need for a new gender "ideology" in the first place. Granted, her ideology has no scientific evidential basis, but for a consenting adult there is absolutely nothing wrong (from a personal liberty POV) with saying "I just feel better this way!"
One question that no one has posed (or I may have missed it) is why Boylan et al feel the need for a new gender "ideology" in the first place. Granted, her ideology has no scientific evidential basis, but for a consenting adult there is absolutely nothing wrong (from a personal liberty POV) with saying "I just feel better this way!"
Could it be that the need to construct a new gender ideology stems, partly, from the desire to justify aggressive gender-related "treatments" (e.g. puberty blockers) for people who cannot give consent- like children?
One question that no one has posed (or I may have missed it) is why Boylan et al feel the need for a new gender "ideology" in the first place. Granted, her ideology has no scientific evidential basis, but for a consenting adult there is absolutely nothing wrong (from a personal liberty POV) with saying "I just feel better this way!"
Could it be that the need to construct a new gender ideology stems, partly, from the desire to justify aggressive gender-related "treatments" (e.g. puberty blockers) for people who cannot give consent- like children?