As a woman writing this, and seemingly a supporter of the strong biology view, how would you feel if someone were to say you shouldn’t even be here debating this, but should leave it to the men with the “bigger brains”. Surely this is the conclusion that many would come to (very wrongly, in my opinion, but I am more of a strong socialism type).
As a woman writing this, and seemingly a supporter of the strong biology view, how would you feel if someone were to say you shouldn’t even be here debating this, but should leave it to the men with the “bigger brains”. Surely this is the conclusion that many would come to (very wrongly, in my opinion, but I am more of a strong socialism type).
Short people (controlling for gender) are well established to have lower IQs on average. No one objects to or against s offended by this because height isn’t a politicized trait like gender. Lo and behold, no one is trying to bar short people from participating in science or assuming that all short people are stupid. People are perfectly capable of knowing that a trait is associated with another trait without prejudging people with the first trait as necessarily having the second trait.
As a woman writing this, and seemingly a supporter of the strong biology view, how would you feel if someone were to say you shouldn’t even be here debating this, but should leave it to the men with the “bigger brains”. Surely this is the conclusion that many would come to (very wrongly, in my opinion, but I am more of a strong socialism type).
Short people (controlling for gender) are well established to have lower IQs on average. No one objects to or against s offended by this because height isn’t a politicized trait like gender. Lo and behold, no one is trying to bar short people from participating in science or assuming that all short people are stupid. People are perfectly capable of knowing that a trait is associated with another trait without prejudging people with the first trait as necessarily having the second trait.