I don’t understand why the common condition of puberty anxiety is never discussed.
These children enter puberty, are distressed about adulthood, misattribute fear of (male,female) adulthood with being male or female and then the rollercoaster starts.
All adolescents have puberty anxiety, since all humans have anxiety as their body changes. It’s an instinct of self preservation.
Sudden clumps of hair and lumps growing on the body, acne and weight-gain are problems in any other context.
It’s startlingly difficult to find discussions on the most obvious source of distress.
Would that a different source were identified I wonder how dire your thesis would remain… because it’s definitely gruesome.
Thank you for this very interesting article. I fear you are correct in many of the things you say. Doctors in the UK have been far too ready to reach for the prescription pad - rather than, say, referral to counselling services - for a very long time. They jealously guard their prescribing privileges by over-using them to the point that I find it difficult to regard most of their work as that of skilled technicians. (I know there are some excuses for this in the UK today , such as the overwork you mention, but it is just a worsening of the situation that has been going on for decades.) The big question, though, is what alternative(s) can be put in place quickly and efficiently? Where, for example, are thousands of counsellors going to come from, and how do we make sure that they aren't trainned by the lunatic ideas of trans ideology? How do we reduce GPs workloads so that the "Dr Finlay's Casebook" dream (which never existed for most people, I know) can be approached, if never met? I have no good answers, but I hope someone else does, otherwise we are all up the creek without a paddle, and many more children and young people are going to be iatrogenically.
Hmmm, too late at night for these depressing thoughts. Good night all.
Your triumph at the victory of evidence based medicine may be a little premature. The political fight back is well underway.
Depressingly the British Medical Association has this on its website
“Members of the BMA’s Council recently voted in favour of a motion which asked the Association to ‘publicly critique the Cass Review’, after doctors and academics in several countries, including the UK, voiced concern about weaknesses in the methodologies used in the Review and problems arising from the implementation of some of the recommendations.”
Further evidence of the ideological capture and political penetration of trans propagandists. No matter that it is the most comprehensive review of the facts and evidence by multiple independent experts. For the BMA it would appear that all of the Cass collaborators have either looked at the wrong facts or interpreted them politically incorrectly; in the trans world view evidence is only good and proper when it supports their political agenda. If it doesn’t, it is to be suppressed. Just as one would expect of totalitarian politics.
As Joseph Goebels, who knew little of science but much about the politics of coercion, is alleged to have said
“It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they clothe ideas and disguise.”
The BMA are about to embark upon a squaring campaign.
I don’t understand why the common condition of puberty anxiety is never discussed.
These children enter puberty, are distressed about adulthood, misattribute fear of (male,female) adulthood with being male or female and then the rollercoaster starts.
All adolescents have puberty anxiety, since all humans have anxiety as their body changes. It’s an instinct of self preservation.
Sudden clumps of hair and lumps growing on the body, acne and weight-gain are problems in any other context.
It’s startlingly difficult to find discussions on the most obvious source of distress.
Would that a different source were identified I wonder how dire your thesis would remain… because it’s definitely gruesome.
Thank you for this very interesting article. I fear you are correct in many of the things you say. Doctors in the UK have been far too ready to reach for the prescription pad - rather than, say, referral to counselling services - for a very long time. They jealously guard their prescribing privileges by over-using them to the point that I find it difficult to regard most of their work as that of skilled technicians. (I know there are some excuses for this in the UK today , such as the overwork you mention, but it is just a worsening of the situation that has been going on for decades.) The big question, though, is what alternative(s) can be put in place quickly and efficiently? Where, for example, are thousands of counsellors going to come from, and how do we make sure that they aren't trainned by the lunatic ideas of trans ideology? How do we reduce GPs workloads so that the "Dr Finlay's Casebook" dream (which never existed for most people, I know) can be approached, if never met? I have no good answers, but I hope someone else does, otherwise we are all up the creek without a paddle, and many more children and young people are going to be iatrogenically.
Hmmm, too late at night for these depressing thoughts. Good night all.
Your triumph at the victory of evidence based medicine may be a little premature. The political fight back is well underway.
Depressingly the British Medical Association has this on its website
“Members of the BMA’s Council recently voted in favour of a motion which asked the Association to ‘publicly critique the Cass Review’, after doctors and academics in several countries, including the UK, voiced concern about weaknesses in the methodologies used in the Review and problems arising from the implementation of some of the recommendations.”
Further evidence of the ideological capture and political penetration of trans propagandists. No matter that it is the most comprehensive review of the facts and evidence by multiple independent experts. For the BMA it would appear that all of the Cass collaborators have either looked at the wrong facts or interpreted them politically incorrectly; in the trans world view evidence is only good and proper when it supports their political agenda. If it doesn’t, it is to be suppressed. Just as one would expect of totalitarian politics.
As Joseph Goebels, who knew little of science but much about the politics of coercion, is alleged to have said
“It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they clothe ideas and disguise.”
The BMA are about to embark upon a squaring campaign.